by Sylvain Poirier
(Short printable version - French version - Russian version)
The world was created and is continuously maintained in its current form, by a horde of selfish hypocritical humans that only care to catch and keep all the love for themselves and have no f***ing care nor compassion for those who can't succeed to do the same.
Heaven is long-lasting, successful love relationship (often formalized as marriage). Basically, the creators of the world are residents of heaven, though they managed to trick non-residents into supporting and contributing to their actions. Indeed, they are our heavenly parents who conceived and created all of us in their own image, and revealed to all of us the rules of life to follow.
There are different hells.
The first hell is the hell of teasing and persecutions by nasty
mates in school;
The second hell is the hell of school work itself, as it can be very stupid, uninteresting and youth-destroying;
The third hell is the hell of a hard job, necessary to earn one's living;
The fourth hell is the eternal hell of loneliness (to have no love for many years, and to not succeed to find one).
You can note that all first three hells are particular instances of the last one: any situation where one is locked against one's will into something else than a love relationship, is a hell.
There are intermediate possible situations between heaven and hell, such as, for example, the case of married people who do not fit very well with each other and/or who often have disputes, even if they formally stay together.
On the issue of explaining the goal of life, the creators of the world split their views and teachings into roughly 3 main categories of voices and guiding forces, taking their shares of ideological domination on the world, while grounding their peaceful coexistence over their perfect mutual ignorance, despite the huge logical divergence between their respective claims:
The first voices, most dominant in arts, literature, media and recreation, actually claim the real truth, that the goal of life is to reach heaven, as described above. However, they only deal with it in terms of songs, story telling, dreams and fancies developed as a picture (rather faitful to reality) of a huge stupid game, but never in terms of any concrete help, organization or any useful action towards an effective accomplishment of this purpose.
Another category of voices, which has been overwhelmingly
dominant in the past (and only recently lost some ground depending
on countries), claims that the goal of life is to reach the
highest morality. More precisely, they see life as a huge stupid
game where victory, identified as the pinnacle of morality,
humility and spirituality, consists in believing the truth. For
this, calling their belief the Word of God and just deciding that
they won, may suffice to satisfy them. Except for those who seem
to also desperately need the rest of the world to agree with their
own vision of it (as this development of their goal seems to
better suit their acute sense of morality : in order to feel more
genuinely selfless, they need to have something to bring to others
too); but this latter need is merely an impression, since, if ever
it was fulfilled, such people might lose all sense of
meaningfulness in their life, as they would be in lack of another
goal to run after, or another explanation of the world's troubles.
The most important issue in life is never the object of any serious research and study, so that the law of the jungle remains unquestionably in force without anybody to feel concerned about the problem.
There are 2 types of sins:
The official sins, that the creators of the world officially condemn;
The creators of the world have established very convenient morality systems in order to feel well at peace in front of God and/or with their own actions. They believe that they have a good morality, that morality consists in doing to others what one wishes others to do for oneself, that this is what anybody should do and that this is what they are doing.
But, the creators of the world who reside in heaven don't need
others to help them into heaven since they are already there; and
they don't see the sense of doing for others, or of approving the
principle of doing for others, what they don't need others to do
for them. And, having found love makes them feel that they are
people of love, the wisest, and so a reference of morality and
wisdom to be followed, while those who did not find love must
certainly be stupid or lacking in love, goodness or wisdom.
Then, those in hell feel weak and humiliated, despised by nature;
and, since this cannot be described as being anyone else's fault,
it all looks like it was their own fault that they do not deserve
love. They are in a emergency to get out of it themselves; their
doom and their intense moral suffering induces confusion and shame
in their feeling, making it much harder for them to think very
precisely and wisely, to trust themselves and their own judgement,
to feel at peace with the world or to care about their doomed
fellows. They feel compelled to listen to the teachings provided
by the creators of the world from which they expect some wisdom or
secret of success.
Any reluctance to listen, that anyone of them might still wish to keep, would anyway collapse under shame in the face of the kindness of the latter who will consider as their duty to very carefully try to help losers by kindly advising them by sharing their natural wisdom (views on life an morality), which is the most obvious thing they can try.
Here are some official morality principles that the creators of the world have adopted as they witnessed from experience these principles to be the most successful guidelines for finding peace and serenity in their heart and conscience:
To put higher taxes on singles than on married people and to give social assistance to those who have children, in order to support the demographic strength of the country and in the name of national solidarity for those who are in need, on a planet whose natural environment is jeopardized by overpopulation with irreversible environmental damages for millions of years.
To be faithful to one's partner, keeping exclusively one and the same love partner for all life, no matter what may happen.
To consider sex as a taboo subject, that no serious person should discuss or visibly care about, and that unmarried people should never enjoy; to file criminal prosecution against anyone who publicly mentions sex, anyone with sex pictures at home, anyone who would do sex outside marriage, and anyone who would desire your partner with whom you are enjoying full sex every night.
To consider the singles problems as their pure own private responsibility for which nobody else nor any collective organization could help, be held responsible for, or even have to be aware of;
Here are the official sins, that are considered wrong and that people should never commit, as these would cause risk and troubles to their reputation, their heart and their conscience.
The sin of being actively
searching for love (as the creators of the world don't want
competitors, but only to be accepted and kept all life long by
their possible matches they anyway chased themselves, or
The sin of daring to speak about sex or about one's situation or suffering of lack of love;
The sin of being generally unhappy and complaining, so that no disagreement with the general (dis)order of the world can ever be accepted or justified;
This morality system is moreover completed by the following rules:
To consider that those who did not find their love and complain about it and/or are openly searching for love are being guilty of:
To believe that the trust in, and
respect of, the full official morality rules, is the best and
surest way to heaven; therefore, that those who did not reach
heaven are guilty of violating the official morality rules
(indeed, they at least commit the second official sin; and
those who complain, commit the last).
There is no exact rule that determines who will go to heaven or hell: this is ultimately a law of chance and the jungle, that the creators of the world are maintaining as an ultimate judge for the fate of people. But this law of the jungle is influenced by a range of different factors. So, the real sins are the acts or circumstances that increase the risk of falling into hell.
Here are the unforgivable sins for which the creators of the world will let you more likely fall into hell at your own fault, without any possible mercy nor anyone to be sorry for you, disregarding any movement of repentance or supplications you may have.
To the hell of teasing and persecutions by nasty mates in school, you may fall for:
The sin of being intelligent, and of having good marks at school
The sin of being different from others, of being shy and of refusing to join the widespread vulgarity and brutality
To the hell of hard lengthy stupid school work, you may fall for:
The sin of being good in science, fond of it and dreaming to make your life in it
The sin of having serious and authoritative parents caring for the professional future of their children, who fully trust the advice from teachers
To the eternal hell of loneliness, you may fall for
The sin of having fallen into one or more of the previous hells, while all your possible matches you might meet later (or have otherwise met earlier) were being grabbed by others. (Also for example, having fallen to the hell of persecution by bad mates did not let you the courage to talk to your possible matches for fear of being ridiculed)
The sin of shyness; thus, of not immediately rushing for exchanging your address with someone you may be interested in, thus running the risk to lose contact with that person forever;
The sin of being different from
others, or to be in an environment (religious orientation,
smoking/non-smoking, or field of study) dominated by people of
your own gender, or more generally where the kind of people
that you might fit with are too few for the demand.
The sin of living in an environment where the only dating places are designed for people with tastes or characteristics are incompatible with one's own (maybe because they are most numerous). For example, the sin of not smoking and disliking smoke and night clubs where the main dating places are smoking bars and night clubs;
The sin of being immediately sincere about your religious orientation in front of an interesting potential match that has another religion and has been brainwashed into thinking that other views and disagreements with the doctrine must be signs of a bad heart;
The sin of seriously caring to trust and follow the above official morality rules as taught by the kind, lovely and virtuous people.
Redemption would be the act of providing to sinners a way through to heaven, beyond the direct method of being oneself a partner of such people (a method which would be nice but cannot produce any huge collective result, as a single person cannot easily save in this way more than one other person - or maybe 2, you see how?).
Redemption has hardly ever been practiced yet, except possibly
for the benefit of just one or a few other people at a time. There
are diverse causes of this fact.
The first cause is that, obviously, a redeemer would not get himself any benefit of his action. At least not during his earthly life. People usually focus on their own well-being, and would not so easily care for the well-being of others who are not their close relatives, without any possible return. Then, everybody is influenced by the above official morality rules.
But, while we might understand that materialists (people
believing there is no afterlife) have indeed no interest to redeem
other people, it could have been expected that the afterlife
believers would see a value in redeeming other people, through
their hope to taste in the afterlife the consequences of their
In order to prevent this, the creators of the world have provided a special subliminal teaching to the afterlife believers, of the following doctrine:
back to Singles Union main page